<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clarification on McGoldrick Proposal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sfnewsletter.wordpress.com/2007/03/08/clarification-on-mcgoldrick-proposal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sfnewsletter.wordpress.com/2007/03/08/clarification-on-mcgoldrick-proposal/</link>
	<description>Go to, www.theFrontSteps.com.  We moved!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 05:52:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ask an Expert (Alexander Clark), better to have SFR or 2 Units in Cow Hollow &#171; sfnewsletter BLOG</title>
		<link>http://sfnewsletter.wordpress.com/2007/03/08/clarification-on-mcgoldrick-proposal/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Ask an Expert (Alexander Clark), better to have SFR or 2 Units in Cow Hollow &#171; sfnewsletter BLOG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 19:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sfnewsletter.wordpress.com/2007/03/08/clarification-on-mcgoldrick-proposal/#comment-60</guid>
		<description>[...] That would avoid any conversion headaches you will undoubtedly encounter. Make sure to read: Our post on McGoldrick&#8217;s proposal, and don&#8217;t hesitate to contact us if you have any more questions.    [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] That would avoid any conversion headaches you will undoubtedly encounter. Make sure to read: Our post on McGoldrick&#8217;s proposal, and don&#8217;t hesitate to contact us if you have any more questions.    [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McGoldrick Strikes&#8230;well, not gold, that&#8217;s for sure &#171; sfnewsletter BLOG</title>
		<link>http://sfnewsletter.wordpress.com/2007/03/08/clarification-on-mcgoldrick-proposal/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>McGoldrick Strikes&#8230;well, not gold, that&#8217;s for sure &#171; sfnewsletter BLOG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 05:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sfnewsletter.wordpress.com/2007/03/08/clarification-on-mcgoldrick-proposal/#comment-44</guid>
		<description>[...] Mon 5 Mar 2007 McGoldrick Strikes&#8230;well, not gold, that&#8217;s for&#160;sure Posted by sfnewsletter under market info , Announcements&#160;  Update: Pay close attention to this statement &#8220;2 or more units built on one lot OR on adjacent lots&#8221;.   We are checking with our sources to translate what exactly that means. Answers [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mon 5 Mar 2007 McGoldrick Strikes&#8230;well, not gold, that&#8217;s for&nbsp;sure Posted by sfnewsletter under market info , Announcements&nbsp;  Update: Pay close attention to this statement &#8220;2 or more units built on one lot OR on adjacent lots&#8221;.   We are checking with our sources to translate what exactly that means. Answers [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
